Do Customers Prefer Talking to a Bot or Waiting on Hold? What the Data Says

 

Long wait times have long been a source of frustration for call center customers. As phone bots and AI-driven customer service platforms become more common, businesses face a key question: Do customers prefer talking to a bot or waiting on hold for a live agent? Understanding customer behavior and satisfaction levels in these scenarios is critical for improving service efficiency and customer experience.


1. The Problem of Long Hold Times

Impact on Customer Satisfaction

  • The average hold time in US call centers is 13 minutes, but wait times can stretch to 40 minutes or longer during peak periods (Zendesk).

  • 57% of customers say they find waiting on hold extremely frustrating (HubSpot).

  • Long hold times lead to higher call abandonment rates and lower customer satisfaction.

Customer Behavior During Long Hold Times

  • 32% of customers hang up after waiting on hold for just 5 minutes (Gartner).

  • 45% of customers report feeling more negative toward a company after a long hold time (Forrester).


2. Rise of Phone Bots as an Alternative to Hold Times

Increased Adoption of AI-Driven Phone Bots

  • Over 70% of US businesses have implemented some form of AI-driven phone bots for customer service (McKinsey).

  • AI-driven bots can handle routine customer inquiries, such as billing questions and account updates, reducing the need for human agents.

Customer Preferences for Bots vs. Hold Times

  • 44% of customers prefer talking to a bot instead of waiting on hold for a live agent (Salesforce).

  • 67% of Millennials and 58% of Gen Z prefer using AI-based customer service platforms for simple issues (Pew Research).

  • However, 60% of Baby Boomers still prefer waiting for a live agent rather than speaking to a bot.

Resolution Rates with Phone Bots

  • AI-based phone bots resolve 65% of customer issues without needing human escalation (Gartner).

  • Customer satisfaction with AI-driven resolutions is 18% lower than with human agents, but customers report higher satisfaction compared to waiting on hold.


3. Challenges with Phone Bots

Lack of Empathy and Personalization

  • 42% of customers report that bots lack understanding of emotional context (Forrester).

  • Misunderstood customer intent increases call handling time and customer frustration.

Complex Issue Resolution Limitations

  • AI bots handle basic inquiries effectively but struggle with complex, multi-step issues.

  • 38% of customers say they are more likely to escalate to a human when a bot cannot resolve their issue within two responses (Zendesk).


4. Best Practices for Balancing Phone Bots and Hold Times

Use AI for First-Level Triage

  • Bots should handle simple inquiries and pass complex cases to human agents.

  • Example: Businesses that implemented AI-based triage reduced hold times by 22% (McKinsey).

Offer Callback Options

  • Giving customers the option to receive a callback instead of waiting on hold increases satisfaction rates.

  • Companies offering callback options report a 30% reduction in call abandonment rates (Gartner).

Improve Natural Language Processing (NLP)

  • Bots that use advanced NLP better understand customer intent and reduce miscommunication.

  • AI bots with improved NLP increase resolution rates by 15% (Forrester).

Combine AI with Human Oversight

  • Enable a seamless handoff from bot to human agent when issues become complex.

  • Businesses with hybrid AI-human models report a 20% increase in customer satisfaction (Salesforce).


5. Case Study: How Company X Balanced Phone Bots and Hold Times

Company X, a telecommunications provider, faced high customer dissatisfaction due to long hold times averaging 18 minutes during peak hours:

  • Implemented an AI-driven phone bot to handle common customer inquiries (billing, account updates).

  • Added a callback option to reduce abandonment rates.

  • Ensured human agent escalation for complex issues.

  • Results:

    • Reduced average hold time from 18 minutes to 8 minutes.

    • Improved first-call resolution by 25%.

    • Increased customer satisfaction score (CSAT) by 18%.


6. Measuring Success

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

  • First Call Resolution (FCR): Measures how often issues are resolved on the first attempt.

  • Average Hold Time: Tracks the length of customer wait time before reaching an agent.

  • Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT): Measures overall customer satisfaction with service resolution.

  • Escalation Rate: Measures the percentage of bot interactions that require human escalation.


7. Conclusion

While long hold times frustrate customers, phone bots present a viable alternative for handling routine inquiries. Younger generations are more willing to use AI-driven customer service, while older customers prefer speaking to human agents. The best approach is to combine AI for simple tasks with human agents for complex issues, offering options for both immediate bot support and callbacks to reduce wait times and improve customer satisfaction.